Skip to main content

(New York, July 3, 2008) – The Thai Army should instruct its officers to provide crucial evidence to a court conducting an inquest into the torture and killing of Imam Yapa Koseng, Human Rights Watch said today.

Imam Yapa, a 56-year-old Muslim religious leader, was tortured and killed by soldiers during an interrogation session on March 20 and 21, 2008, at the camp of the Army’s 39th Taskforce in Rue Soh district, in southern Narathiwrat province (see the Human Rights Watch statement of March 26, 2008, “Imam’s Killing Highlights Army Abuse in South”). Domestic and international pressure prompted Thailand’s Army Chief, General Anupong Phaochinda, to pledge that those found responsible would be punished and to end abuses by Thai security forces in the south of the country.  
 
A judicial inquiry into the imam’s death has been blocked by army stonewalling, Human Rights Watch said. On June 30, 2008, Major Wicha Phuthong, commanding officer of the 39th Taskforce at the time of the killing, testified to Narathiwat Court in the post-mortem inquest that he did not know who tortured and killed Iman Yapa, the names and ranks of the soldiers on duty at the time, or other relevant details. He testified that written records of those on duty were destroyed. He further stated he had the authority to grant permission for interrogation of detainees in the camp, but no one made a request to him to interrogate Imam Yapa.  
 
“Imam Yapa’s case is a test for the Thai Army on whether it can hold abusers in its ranks accountable,” said Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “General Anupong has put his credibility on the line. Will he allow a cover-up, or will he ensure that murderers in the ranks will be brought to justice?”  
 
Testimony by a forensic expert on June 30 showed that Imam Yapa’s cause of death was blunt force trauma, including fractures of his ribs from the front, the side, and the back. Broken bones punctured his lungs. Bruises and wounds were found all over his body, including his eyes, forehead, and lips. He also had long abrasion marks on his back, indicating he may have been dragged on his ankles across a hard and rough surface.  
 
Imam Yapa’s son witnessed the treatment of his father by the Army 39th Taskforce. He told Human Rights Watch:  
 
“Soldiers took my father away at about 8 p.m. on March 20. That was the first interrogation. I saw them take him behind the camp clinic – not far from where I was detained. I could hear everything that happened to my father. I heard punching and kicking noises. I heard my father scream in pain. That went on for at least two hours. I was so angry that I could do nothing to help my father. When my father was taken back, I saw those soldiers kept kicking him very hard all the way. When my father fell down, they kicked him again and again. They were laughing. My father could barely walk when they forced him to get up on his feet.  
 
“Then, about 30 minutes later, they came to take him out and beat him up again. I could hear my father beg them not to hurt him anymore. They brought him back about midnight. This time, they had to carry him back. I only had about 15 minutes with my father before the soldiers took him out again until 2 a.m. on March 21. But this time the light was on behind the clinic. So I could see what happened to my father. There were more than 10 soldiers hitting, punching, and kicking my father. I saw them hit him hard on his head. When my father fell down on the floor, some soldiers stepped on him and stomped on his chest. When they were done with him, my father could not walk at all. Two soldiers had to drag him by his ankles back to the truck. My father was still conscious, and he told me that it hurt so much. I tried to ask for help. I shouted to the guards to take my father to hospital. They did not even turn their heads. I stayed with my father until he died. Just before dawn on Friday, March 21 – about 5:30 a.m. – my father died on the truck where we were locked up.”  
 
“No soldier has ever been prosecuted for abducting, torturing, or extrajudicially killing Muslims in the south,” said Adams. “Because the evidence is so strong, this should be an easy case for the Army to show it’s serious about addressing impunity.”  
 
The torture and killing of Imam Yapa highlights the broader problem of ill-treatment of Muslims in Army custody during operations against separatist insurgents in the south. Although every soldier in the southern border provinces carries a code-of-conduct booklet produced by the Internal Security Operations Command (ISOC), many former detainees interviewed by Human Rights Watch said that after being arrested they were immediately tortured by interrogators – including soldiers in uniform and in plainclothes – at district-level camps. They alleged that abuses continued after they were transferred to the Army’s main interrogation center at Ingkayuthboriharn Camp in Pattani.  
 
The most common forms of torture and other ill-treatment reported were ear-slapping, punching, kicking, beating with wooden and metal clubs, forced nudity, exposure to cold temperature, electric shock, strangulation, suffocation with plastic bags, and piercing the detainee’s genitalia with needles. Lawyers and independent medical experts interviewed by Human Rights Watch report similar accounts.  
 
Human Rights Watch has repeatedly raised its concerns with Thai authorities that detainees in security-related cases in the southern border provinces are extremely vulnerable to torture, “disappearance,” and extrajudicial killing during pre-charge detention. These abuses occur under laws that allow detainees to be held in Army custody for 37 days without safeguards against abuses.  
 
Human Rights Watch called on the Thai government and Army to immediately ensure the safety of all detainees; to provide urgent medical care to all who sustained injuries during arrest or in detention; to allow timely access to legal counsel and family members; and to launch a full investigation into allegations of torture and ill-treatment.  
 
Thai security forces under the command of Lieutenant-General Viroj Buacharoon of the 4th Army Region (in charge of Thailand’s 14 southern provinces) have launched sweeping operations in the past year that have resulted in about a 50 percent decrease in insurgent attacks. But violence has flared up again over the past three weeks, particularly in Narathiwat and Pattani provinces, where there have been many reports of arbitrary arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings by security personnel. Insurgents have said that continuing attacks were in response to violence and abuses committed by Thai security forces.  
 
“Ongoing abuses by Thai security forces and the culture of impunity have created a fertile breeding ground for insurgents to recruit new members and justify their campaign of violence,” said Adams. “The Thai authorities have the responsibility to restore peace and stability in the south, but they must do so in accordance with human rights standards.” 

The inquest trial of Mr. Yapa Kaseng,

Imam who died in army custody on 21 Mar 2008

In Rusoh District, Narathivath Province

 

Detail of the hearing on 30 June 2008

 

1)     

The hearing started around 9.15 am and finished around 17.00 pm.

 

2)     

There were three judges as a panel. One of the panelists was the Chief of Narathivath Court. There were two state prosecutors and the trial process was also observed by the Chief of Narathivath State prosecutor office. There were a number of trial observers including representatives of Working Group on Justice for Peace and students.

 

3)     

Three witnesses gave evidence – Mrs. Nima Kaseng, wife of Imam Yapa, Dr. Suphawit Pakdichoke, of Rueso district hospital who performed post-mortem examination (initial examination of the death body but not autopsy) of the body, and Major Wicha Phuthong who at the date of incident was the Acting Commander of Special Task Force Unit 39.

 

4)     

Mrs. Nima Kaseng, wife of Imam Yapa Kaseng, in her testimony said that the authorities arrested Imam Yapa, her two sons and a nephew from their house on 19th March. Imam Yapa was in good health when he was arrested on the 19th March. The arrested people were first detained at Ruesoh police station for about 2 hrs and then taken to Muang District of Narathivath Province for a press conference. After that they were moved to Task Force Unit 39 in Narathivath. The Imam, his sons, nephew and three other people were detained in a police truck inside the camp. On 21st March, she was informed by hers sons who had been arrested together with the Imam that their father had died.

 

5)     

Dr. Suphawit Pakdichoke said that the cause of death of Imam was in medical terms, 'blunt force trauma'…strong force that had broken his ribs and the broken bones had punctured the lungs. Apart from that the Imam had long abrasion marks on his back that showed that he might have been dragged across a hard and rough surface. There were bruises and wounds all over his body including his eyes, forehead and lips.

 

6)     

Major Wicha Phuthong, who is at present deputed with the Armored Cavalry Section 18, Cavalry Division 1 based in Petchaboon Province was the Acting Commander of the Special Task Force Unit 39 on the date of incident. The Major denied knowing any details about the wounds and injuries on the body of Imam Yapha. The Major said that though he was the Acting Commander at that time, the Commander had already assigned duties to all officers. The Major denied knowing the name of the officer on duty to guard and manage the keys of the truck containing the detainees.

 

7)     

 The Major said that usually there are some written records of the guard duty assigned to the officers, but such records are destroyed afterwards. The records of 21st March have also been destroyed. The Major said that under the regulations intelligence officers have the authority to interrogate detainees after they have taken the requisite permission from the Camp Commander. At the time of incident the Major had the authority to grant permissions for interrogation – however no officer had made a request to interrogate Imam.

 

8)     

The Major also denied that he was transferred to his present duty in Petchaboon province by way of disciplinary action against him as he had been alleged to be involved in torturing Imam Yapa.

 

9)     

The Next hearing: 

            14-15th Aug 08: examination of witnesses (family members)

            29th – 30th Sept 08: examination of witnesses (Army officers)

 

10)  

 This inquest trial was very rapid (only three months after the incident) in comparison with    

  other three cases death in custody or during the arrest by army officers in year 2007. 

 

As of 1st June 200

Updated on Imam Yapha Kaseng case and related issues

 

22 March 08

Relatives and lawyers went to report to the police in relation to the death of Imam Yapa Kaseng at Police station of Rusoh District of Narathivath Province.         

 

On the same day, Member of Narathivath provincial Council called wife of Imam Yapa Kaseng to his house and offered 20,000 baht for the funeral. The family denied receiving the money.        

 

23 March 08

An activist believed to work closely to authorities tried to persuade the family to end the fight for justice on Imam Yapa case. He offered 500,000 baht and he said all detainees would be released. The family believed that it was same with the Army offer as it was mentioned earlier also that the Army would offer 500,000 baht.

24 March 08

Rusoh District Governor met with the family and offers an amount of money to the family as compensation and also asked the family to end the fight for justice. (Please crossed check the detail  information from WGJP who observed the meeting)

27  March 08

Rusoh District Governor brought two Imam’s sons from Ingkhayuth Camp to Rusoh police station.  Rusoh District Governor said that all detainees will be released without charges except Mr. Sukreeranai that got the arrest warrant.  However, the family should agree in no giving information to media and should not take legal action.  The relative did not agree therefore the two sons were brought back to Ingkhayuth Camp.

28 March 08

Relatives of 5 detainees (accept Mr. Sukreeranai) were asked to meet the army representatives at Ingkhayuth Camp. The families didn’t accept any offers.

30 Mar 8

Mr. Anan Kaseng, one of Imam’s sons was released and allowed to stay home one night. Some officers sent him home. The relatives said that he was sent to convince the family not to complaints to international organisation, not to meet with lawyers, not taking legal action. Lawyers can attend the formal negotiation and the deal would be in the written record. The relatives did not accept the offer.

31 Mar 08

The daughter of Imam Yapa Kaseng and Mr. Anan Kaseng came to lawyer (s) and informed about the army negotiation and at the same time requested the lawyer(s) to take legal action on the released of the five detainees. The relatives also requested the lawyer (s) to take legal action on the death of Imam Yapa Kaseng. The lawyer(s) accepted to submit the petition on the release of 5 detainees. Mr. Anan Kaseng was sent back to Ingkhayuth Camp.

01 Apr.08

Police of Rusoh District Police station asked the daughter for her testimony as witness together with another daughter on the death of Imam Yapa.  The lawyer(s) came to observe the session.

6 April 08

Mr. Suriya Tawanchay came to deliver the same offer again to the relatives of Imam Yapa Kaseng.

 

8-10 April 08

The lawyer(s) files the petition(s) to release 5 detainees at Narathivath court.

The court heard the testimonies of the relatives and the detainees about the torture incidents in the court.

Since 15 May 08

We learnt that the police of Rusoh have submitted the Inquest trial file to Narathivath State Attorney office.

 

We also leant that the inquest trial will be started on 30 June 2008.

The accusation file of the death of Imam Yapa Kaseng was also sent to Anti-Corruption Commission.

 

Together with the two accusation files of Mr.Rayu and Mr. Sukreeranai were also sent to Anti- Corruption Commission. Mr. Rayu and Mr. Sukreeranai were subjected to torture at the same incident with Imam Yapa Kaseng. The two have filed the complaints to Rusoh Police.

 

The Rusoh Police has already asked the two victims to identify the perpetrators by their photos.

 

Mr. Rayu was released on 10 April 2008 as the lawyer complaints to Narathivath Court.

 

Mr. Sukreeranai is under the pre-trial detention in Narathivath prison since 21 March 2008.  (Note: He was charged with several offences including murders and members of illegal association. The first hearing of Mr. Sukreeranai case was scheduled to be on 28 July 2008)

 

 

 

 

Source
<p>http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2008/07/03/thaila19251.htm</p>
Prachatai English's Logo

Prachatai English is an independent, non-profit news outlet committed to covering underreported issues in Thailand, especially about democratization and human rights, despite pressure from the authorities. Your support will ensure that we stay a professional media source and be able to meet the challenges and deliver in-depth reporting.

• Simple steps to support Prachatai English

1. Bank transfer to account “โครงการหนังสือพิมพ์อินเทอร์เน็ต ประชาไท” or “Prachatai Online Newspaper” 091-0-21689-4, Krungthai Bank

2. Or, Transfer money via Paypal, to e-mail address: [email protected], please leave a comment on the transaction as “For Prachatai English”