Today ANFREL released its first pre-election report outlining its concerns ahead of the December 23rd election. The report, a summary of findings from 37 observers between 10th and 14th December, underlined the need for greater voter education by the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) and political parties.
"One week before the election, it is worrying that many voters still do not seem to understand the new electoral system or party's policies. Political debate has been reduced to being for or against political personalities. Campaigning has been less vigorous than in previous elections, particularly in the three southernmost provinces," said Ichal Supriadi, ANFREL Mission Coordinator.
Observers found that voters expected prevalent vote buying but few were willing to cite details or report such cases to the ECT or police, despite the introduction of stricter laws. "People are scared to speak out against powerful people living in their communities," continued Supriadi.
Regarding advance voting beginning today, political parties have expressed concern to ANFREL observers about the transparency of the process. "The ECT should ensure that advance voting is as transparent as possible - particularly the storage and transporation of ballots - to build trust with political parties," concluded Supriadi.
|
PRE-ELECTION REPORT 1
Observations 10th -14th December 2007
Voter views
Though almost all voters are aware of the election and when it will be held, not all understand changes to the electoral system, particularly voters in more rural areas. Two changes in particular appear to have confused some voters: (i) that the numbers assigned to candidates for constituency seats and their parties on the proportional representation list are not the same (ii) that for some constituencies you can vote for more than one candidate
Local NGOs and university students are running some small campaigns on voter education, encouraging people to vote and trying to deter vote buying, but some means used by state officials seem less effective. For example, heads of villages (phuyaibans) reading out information over community loudspeakers was considered an ineffective way to educate people.
Knowledge of party policies is generally poor. This is partly the result of a highly polarised political environment - candidates felt that it was more important to emphasise whether they were for or against particular political personalities rather than sell themselves on the basis of their policies. This has caused some disillusionment amongst some voters who feel that political debate has become less issue based. In the three southernmost provinces, there was considerable apathy that politics in general could help solve the conflict.
Vote buying
Recently passed election laws and regulations are not well understood amongst voters. However, most were aware that vote selling, in addition to vote buying, is illegal and carries harsh punishments. There is a widespread perception that vote buying is occurring and that the problem would not be curbed in this election.
Almost all voters were reluctant to report vote buying or other elections violations to the ECT or police. Cash incentives for information are not effective. Local ECT staff themselves recognise the fear that people have about speaking out against those who they must live alongside, particularly powerful individuals (phuyai), doubting that a single vote buyer would be successfully prosecuted in their provinces.
Some provincial ECTs remarked that certain methods of vote buying are difficult to detect, such as purchasing phone credit for voters. The transfer of money to party agents well in advance of the election, before close scrutiny could be paid by the Elections Commission and another agencies, poses another challenge.
Views about vote buying remain rooted in a patron-client conception of the relationship between candidates and voters. To quote one candidate in Buri Ram: "This is not vote buying. It is generosity, helping poor people who have given their time listening to you so that they can feed their family after spending the day listening to you ... money plays a very important role in elections".
Expectations were that the distribution of money or in-kind gifts voter would increase closer to election day, particularly on "barking dog night" (22nd December).
Campaigning / military affairs
Voters remarked that campaigning by political parties has been much less vigorous this year than in previous years, partly because of a fear of breaking stricter election laws and regulations.
Poor outreach by political parties is a particularly acute problem in the three southernmost provinces, where campaigning is extremely subdued. The ongoing violence has created a climate of fear within which candidates are reluctant to openly campaign, and which may deter voter turnout.
While martial law has not been overtly applied to disperse rallies or detain party supporters, in some districts it has created a climate of fear where freedom of expression has been curtailed. Some PPP candidates have claimed that they are being closely watched and targeted by the military, while the party's supporters do not perceive the military as neutral.
Government officials / Election Commission
Allegations have been made by political parties and voters themselves that village headmen (phuyaiban) and other civil servants are not acting neutrally and would continue to wield political influence over voters in their villages.
The process of training Election Commission staff is ongoing, "cascading" down the levels of the ECT, but it is taking place worryingly close to election day itself. Voter lists have been made public in most areas but ANFREL observers did not such lists in several provinces they visited. Candidate forums organised by the ECT have generally not been successful, ignored by key parties and poorly attended by voters. Candidates themselves do not seem to think that provincial ECTs have the capacity to thoroughly investigate complaints.
Advance voting
The very large increase in the number of voters who have registered to vote in advance, outside of their home province, has prompted some concern by political parties. In particular, the process of storing and transporting ballots is not seen as transparent enough, and has engendered suspicion by political parties of the ECT.
|
Prachatai English is an independent, non-profit news outlet committed to covering underreported issues in Thailand, especially about democratization and human rights, despite pressure from the authorities. Your support will ensure that we stay a professional media source and be able to meet the challenges and deliver in-depth reporting.
• Simple steps to support Prachatai English
1. Bank donation via the "Foundation for Community Educational Media (FCEM)", Krungthai Bank, account number 091-010-4328, Swift Code: KRTHTHBK
2. Or, Transfer money via Paypal, to e-mail address: [email protected], please leave a comment on the transaction as “For Prachatai English”